August 30, 2024

The AfD poses an economical risk

Elections in Thuringia and Saxony will mark a worrying rightward shift.

This Sunday, the East German states of Saxony and Thuringia will hold their state elections. For months, opinion polls indicate a significant political shift to the right. The Alternative for Germany party (AfD), a party known for its pronounced far-right stance particularly in East Germany, is leading in the latest polls. As the total number of eligible voters in all Eastern states together is less than in Germanys largest state North Rhine-Westphalia alone, and roughly equal to Bavaria, one might be tempted to view these elections as a minor occurrence with little impact on national politics.

However, that would be a mistake: These state elections carry a significant signal. Not just in terms of socio-political issues and the debate over who is on firm constitutional grounds and who is a dangerous extremist. It's also about the economy.

The Mittelstand stands up against the AfD

The AfD portrays itself as the defender of small, hard-working individuals and small and medium sized enterprises, Germany’s fabled “Mittelstand”. However, this very group does not seek the AfD’s protection. Quite the opposite, they feel threatened by the right-wing party. An analysis paper by the association representing family-owned businesses, highlights point by point why the AfD in government would hurt Germany as a business location.

And it's not surprising that entrepreneurs are sounding the alarm. Talking about companies that are part of the campaign "Made in Germany – Made by Diversity," AfD hardliner Björn Höcke, who is also his party’s candidate for the premiership in Thuringia, said during a campaign event on Saturday: "I hope these companies face severe, severe economic turbulence." In general, businesses should "just shut up" on political matters.

Why the AfD is bad for business

Earlier this year, I discussed why the AfD's intention to leave the EU and abandon the euro would be akin to economic suicide. According to the German Economic Institute IW, such a move could lead to a loss of one-sixth of Germany's economic output.

Furthermore, the AfD’s fiscal policies, which include tax cuts and generous pension plans without clear funding, would likely lead to substantial budget deficits, highlighting a lack of economic literacy within the party.

The party dismisses the skilled labor shortage as an unfounded claim by business associations and lobbyists. Should the AfD get its way, Germany’s labor shortage would worsen. They propose reducing daycare and all-day school provisions to encourage parental childcare, a move that would undoubtedly complicate the work-life balance for young parents. Their call for retirement at 63, mandatory military service, and an additional year of community service would further reduce the workforce. Not to mention their hostile stance on immigration of all sorts.

There is already a significant shortage of skilled workers

Businesses in Eastern Germany are particularly vulnerable to an increase in AfD power, which would likely exacerbate the existing worker shortage. It's well understood in these regions that rabble-rousing rhetoric is insufficient to stimulate economic growth. The head of the association of family owned businesses in Thuringia noted with concern, "With this state election, Thuringia stands on the brink of economic disaster." I am afraid that she is probably right with her gloomy prediction.

This publication is addressed exclusively at recipients in the EU, Switzerland, Liechtenstein and the United Kingdom. This report is not being distributed by LBBW to any person in the United States and LBBW does not intend to solicit any person in the United States. LBBW is under the supervision of the European Central Bank (ECB), Sonnemannstraße 22, 60314 Frankfurt/Main (Ger many) and the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), Graurheindorfer Str. 108, 53117 Bonn (Ger many) / Marie-Curie-Str. 24-28, 60439 Frankfurt/Main (Germany). This publication is based on generally available sources which we are not able to verify but which we believe to be reliable. Nevertheless, we assume no liability for the accuracy and completeness of this publication. It conveys our non-binding opinion of the market and the products at the time of the editorial deadline, irrespective of any own holdings in these products. This publication does not replace individual advice. It serves only for informational purposes and should not be seen as an offer or request for a purchase or sale. For additional, more timely in-formation on concrete investment options and for individual investment advice, please contact your investment advisor. We retain the right to change the opinions expressed herein at any time and without prior notice. Moreover, we retain the right not to update this information or to stop such updates entirely without prior notice. Past performance, simulations and forecasts shown or described in this publication do not constitute a reliable indicator of future performance. The acceptance of provided research services by a securities services company can qualify as a benefit in supervisory law terms. In these cases LBBW assumes that the benefit is intended to improve the quality of the relevant service for the customer of the benefit recipient. Additional Disclaimer for recipients in the United Kingdom: Authorised and regulated by the European Central Bank (ECB), Sonnemannstraße 22, 60314 Frankfurt/Main (Germany) and the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), Graurheindorfer Str. 108, 53117 Bonn (Germany) / Marie-Curie-Str. 24-28, 60439 Frankfurt/Main (Germany). Deemed authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority. Subject to regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority and limited regulation by the Prudential Regulation Authority. Details of the Temporary Permissions Regime, which allows EEA-based firms to operate in the UK for a limited period while seeking full authorisation, are available on the Financial Conduct Authority’s website.