The housing market in Germany remains extremely tight, particularly in the segment of affordable housing. The country is currently facing a shortfall of over 700,000 homes, a figure that is on the rise. In the segment of reasonably priced rentals the scarcity is particularly pronounced, and there especially in metropolitan areas.
Prices for residential properties are stabilizing in Germany. While this may be welcome news for homeowners, it offers little solace to the majority of the population: 52 percent of individuals in Germany live in rented accommodation. No nation in the EU has a higher share of tenants. The factors contributing to the stabilization of house prices actually adversely affect the vast majority of tenants: population growth, a precipitous decline in housing starts, along with rising rents (particularly for new leases). This situation highlights a growing discrepancy between supply and demand
Housing poverty: Germany compares poorly
The issue of housing scarcity has been a longstanding debate between the Alps and the Baltic Sea. But how widespread is the problem really? The answer is quite alarming and continues to worsen. Look no further than the prevalence of 'housing poverty', which measures the percentage of the population living in households that have to spend more than 40% of their disposable income on housing. In this regard, Germany ranks unenviably high. Moreover, rents for new contracts have recently seen significant hikes, potentially exacerbating the problem further.
Housing Poverty in 2020 and 2023
Amid ongoing labor shortages and demographic shifts, unemployment has become less of a concern for most workers. This elevates the housing problem to the primary social challenge in Germany. While it might be tempting to leave the resolution of this problem to market forces, I would warn against this approach. It could further endanger the already fragile social fabric. Discontent stemming from existential fears about such basic needs as shelter can quickly spiral into radicalization. As a society, we should not risk testing out where the breaking point lies.
The way forward
It's critically important to boost the availability of housing in Germany, particularly the inexpensive options. However, the country is witnessing the culmination of a prolonged trend of a dwindling social housing sector (see Fig. 3). Since the millennium, nearly 200 social housing units have been lost every day, despite a growing residential population. The impact on housing poverty is starkly illustrated when looking at the example of Vienna, which has consistently maintained a strong portfolio of municipal properties. Almost half of the apartments in the Austrian capital are owned by the city or nonprofit organizations. In contrast, in Berlin only about a quarter are such properties. This difference underscores a broader national trend. Notably, the rate of housing poverty in Austria is less than half of that in Germany.
Thus, I see a pressing need for bolder intervention from the German authorities. This goes beyond acting as a developer of new housing estates, although that is also important. More land must be allocated for housing projects. Furthermore, overly complex regulations should be streamlined to stimulate the supply side. Providing subsidized loans to support new developments may also help. The most unpromising strategy, however, is continuing with the current set of policies.
This publication is addressed exclusively at recipients in the EU, Switzerland, Liechtenstein and the United Kingdom. This report is not being distributed by LBBW to any person in the United States and LBBW does not intend to solicit any person in the United States. LBBW is under the supervision of the European Central Bank (ECB), Sonnemannstraße 22, 60314 Frankfurt/Main (Ger many) and the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), Graurheindorfer Str. 108, 53117 Bonn (Ger many) / Marie-Curie-Str. 24-28, 60439 Frankfurt/Main (Germany). This publication is based on generally available sources which we are not able to verify but which we believe to be reliable. Nevertheless, we assume no liability for the accuracy and completeness of this publication. It conveys our non-binding opinion of the market and the products at the time of the editorial deadline, irrespective of any own holdings in these products. This publication does not replace individual advice. It serves only for informational purposes and should not be seen as an offer or request for a purchase or sale. For additional, more timely in-formation on concrete investment options and for individual investment advice, please contact your investment advisor. We retain the right to change the opinions expressed herein at any time and without prior notice. Moreover, we retain the right not to update this information or to stop such updates entirely without prior notice. Past performance, simulations and forecasts shown or described in this publication do not constitute a reliable indicator of future performance. The acceptance of provided research services by a securities services company can qualify as a benefit in supervisory law terms. In these cases LBBW assumes that the benefit is intended to improve the quality of the relevant service for the customer of the benefit recipient. Additional Disclaimer for recipients in the United Kingdom: Authorised and regulated by the European Central Bank (ECB), Sonnemannstraße 22, 60314 Frankfurt/Main (Germany) and the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), Graurheindorfer Str. 108, 53117 Bonn (Germany) / Marie-Curie-Str. 24-28, 60439 Frankfurt/Main (Germany). Deemed authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority. Subject to regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority and limited regulation by the Prudential Regulation Authority. Details of the Temporary Permissions Regime, which allows EEA-based firms to operate in the UK for a limited period while seeking full authorisation, are available on the Financial Conduct Authority’s website.